Articles

Thursday, August 07, 2014

Are All Dead Children Created Equal?



While furious mobs of leftists draped in Keffiyahs and corn syrup were shrieking about Gaza in the public squares of every major city, ISIS was continuing its genocidal advance on Baghdad. In the last 24 hours, the Yazidis, a non-Muslim minority, fled ISIS to a mountaintop where their children are dying of thirst. 

The stark reality of their plight, caught between thirst and a genocidal army, is in sharp contrast to the phony claims made about Gaza where truckloads of goods continue passing from Israel during wartime, where the malls have iPhones and the five star hotels offer cakes so tall they can only be cut from a crane.

The dead Yazidi children won’t inspire any protests or much in the way of outrage. The hysterical rallies for Gaza won’t suddenly turn into anti-ISIS rallies. If any of the angry white hipsters with dead baby posters are asked about it, they will offer some variation on, “It’s Bush’s fault” or “It’s Tony Blair’s fault.”

And they had been out there in the early part of the century denouncing any move to remove Saddam Hussein from power. The dead children gassed by Saddam, along with the children in his prisons, were unfortunately created less equal than the photogenic, oddly blonde children of Gaza’s Hamaswood.

Anna, a two-year-old girl whose feet were crushed by Saddam’s torturers, never mattered to them.  It isn’t the children that they care about, not the dying Yazidi children in Iraq, the tortured children in Saddam Hussein’s prisons, or even the dead children of Gaza, used as human shields by Hamas in life and then brandished at rallies after their deaths as cardboard propaganda shields by furious Marxists.

When they thought that Israel had bombed a playground near the al-Shati refugee camp killing nine children, they went into murderous paroxysm of outrage. When it turned out that a misfired Hamas rocket was responsible, they fell silent. 

They have equally little interest in the 3-year-old Gazan girl killed by a Hamas rocket in the early days of the war. 

The same thing had happened in 2012 when a dead 11-month old baby, formerly an iconic front page photo, vanished into obscurity once the death turned out to have been caused by a Hamas rocket. The same thing happened to Hadil al-Haddad, a 2-year-old girl in Gaza, who went from iconic photo to yesterday’s news once it turned out that a Hamas rocket had been responsible for her death

However the photos of those dead and wounded children, along with the dead children of Syria and perhaps soon the dead children of the Yazidi, will go on showing up at spitefully angry anti-Israel rallies.

If they genuinely cared about children, they would be at least as outraged, moved and pained by the death of a child at the hands of Saddam Hussein, as they were by ISIS terrorists dying at the hands of American and British soldiers. Instead dead Iraqi children inspired apathy and dead Al Qaeda outrage.

If it was the children that they cared about, then the death of an Israeli child or a Muslim child at the hands of Hamas would matter as much to them as the ones on the bloody placards they now brandish.

But they don’t and they never did.

They don’t love children or anyone else for that matter. They only hate. The dead children are only pieces of photographic paper to them which they use to shamelessly assault their ideological enemies.

Once Israel pulled out of Gaza, a report by the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs found a striking increase in the amount of internal violence as the majority of deaths were now being caused by clan feuds

During 2007’s battles between Israel and Hamas, as many Palestinian Arab children died in clan feuds as they did in Israeli air strikes. And unlike air strikes, children killed in clan feuds aren’t accidents. 

The dirty little secret is that while Palestinian identity is as phony as a three dollar bill, clan identity is a powerful and defining force. Furthermore it is often hard to tell whether Hamas and Fatah terrorists are aligned with a movement because of personal belief or because their clan is aligned with a movement.

Hamas and Fatah aren’t just ideologies. They are also large extended clan families which fight over land, honor and economic control. 

The origins of Israel’s struggle with terrorism go back to the roots of the al-Husayni clan which arrived in Jerusalem after the Crusades and has been trying to control the city and everything else ever since. 

Prominent members and associates of the clan include Hitler’s Mufti, Hajj Amin al-Husayni, and Yasser Arafat. (Arafat however was more directly associated with the Al-Qudwas, a clan which extends from Iraq to Egypt. Both clans considered themselves to be a sort of titled aristocracy, yet another fact which makes their post-colonial posturing as oppressed peoples ridiculously hypocritical and laughable.)

Muslim children being killed in clan feuds between huge families whose local branches claim to be the leaders of the Palestinian people even as they fight with equal ferocity for control over Syria and Iraq is not a subject that any of the placard wavers are interested in. Open that door a crack and their whole self-righteous campaign collapses into incoherent bleating as they struggle to justify the primacy of one terrorist group over another based on the claims of descent from Mohammed by its leading clans.   

There are stories that are simply not told.

When UN inspector and anti-war activist Scott Ritter visited Saddam Hussein’s Iraq, he encountered a prison which, in his own words, “appeared to be a prison for children — toddlers up to pre-adolescents — whose only crime was to be the offspring of those who have spoken out politically against the regime of Saddam Hussein. It was a horrific scene.”

Ritter refused to discuss it any further, “because what I saw was so horrible that it can be used by those who would want to promote war with Iraq, and right now I'm waging peace.”

Scott Ritter, who was later arrested for soliciting underage girls on the internet, wasn’t waging peace. No more than the placard wavers in London, Sydney and Montreal are waging peace. He was fighting to keep Saddam Hussein power. And he was willing to sacrifice a prison full of children to do that. 

He was willing to sacrifice little girls like Anna, who had her feet crushed in a torture chamber, to keep Saddam Hussein in power. Ritter was willing to do it because he had the same morals as Saddam.

That is the same attitude that the placard wavers have toward the children of Gaza, of Iraq and of countless other places. They use them to wage war in the name of peace when they come in handy.
And when they die of Hamas rockets and clan feuds, when they are killed by ISIS and the entire murderous alphabet soup of Islamic terrorism, they drop them like yesterday’s garbage. 

For Hamas and its supporters screaming “Free Gaza” at the top of their lungs, children, dead or alive, are just another propaganda weapon in the arsenal of terrorist theocracy.

They are eager and willing to let Hamas go on killing Jewish and Muslim children in the name of its war. 

(A version of this article originally appeared at Front Page Magazine)

9 comments:

Rich Fader said...

Why do Canadian pro-Palestinian protesters wear kilts?
Because sheep can hear zippers.

but pygmies said...

Amen, brother...

Dennis Latham said...

This article speaks the truth, and it's enough to make any good person sick. I watch the news most nights, amazed by the slant against Israel. Never once do they say anything about Israel's right to defend itself. How can a sane world allow the terrorist doctrine to exist? Obama gives weapons to ISIS in Syria when even a gerbil would know what was going to happen, and now he wants to bomb them. I don't believe the phony concern for the people trapped on the mountain. They are going to die because no country will dump the Liberal political correctness scam and wipe these demons out once and for all. War is money and money is being made without any thought about the future.

Anonymous said...

reading this blog continues to give me hope that there are still some people who get it and understand the nature of evil and its hypocrisy.

For those of us who think but cannot so eloquently express what Daniel does, we must thank and protect his forum to say what he says.

The war in the middle east will spread to the USA next. As much as we might think Europe will fight the battle first against the Scourge of Islam, they won't. They are not fighters and have allowed their countries to be overrun with scum. We have people here who will fight and Obama has started the war. The question is when those of us who see what is happening will fight back against the foreign and domestic evil which is clearly inside us like a cancer. There is not much time left.

Anonymous said...

The left have no moral outrage against the millions upon millions of children exterminated for no other reason than their own mother's convenience. They have no moral outrage about children being deprived of both their biological mother and father. They have no moral outrage about indoctrinating children into hating their own country and brainwashing them into living a life of vice and corruption, which are their virtues, and rewarding for it. They are all for war when it is a war against common sense, the rule of law, responsibility, honor, courage, integrity, and the principles, values and traditions necessary for a stable and free society.

Elaine

Drow Ranger said...

not to mention, have you ever heard any one of these leftists who shed crocodile tears for dead Gaza children ever so much as sniffle about all the dead children that Janet Reno killed in Waco?

WomanHonorThyself said...

as always all I can do is bless you for your tireless efforts and brilliant articulation.
You are a God send -quite literally my friend. Shabbat Shalom:)

Daniel Greenfield @ the Sultan Knish blog said...

Woman, thank you

Anonymous, if you insist on posting extended off topic comments, you shouldn't be surprised when they don't go up.

Doug Mayfield said...

Thank you for the article. The Left is malevolent, violent, and thoroughly authoritarian and so embraces slavery of all types and tyrants who enforce it.

Castro in Cuba, Chavez in Venezuela, Che, Pol Pot, Mao, Stalin, on and on. Now it's Hamas.

But the key characteristic which entices, enthralls, the Left is an absolute state in which freedom and individual rights are abolished and in which cheap murdering thugs are in charge.

As long as there are Leftists in positions of importance in the media, you will see Hamas excused, even embraced. Left wing journalists will grovel to the cheap slave masters and death worshipers in Gaza, and Israel, the single free country in the Middle east, will be the 'aggressor'.

Post a Comment